SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 4518

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
C & L MINERALS SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Yeap Cheng Hoe ,Respondent Advocate: Kung Khai Hang

JUDGMENT

Yusrin Faidz Yusoff JC:

Introduction

[1] This case involves a Shariah-compliant financing arrangement between Maybank Islamic Berhad ("the plaintiff") and C & L Minerals Sdn Bhd ("D1"). The facilities were extended to D1 and secured by personal guarantees from its two directors, Choo Ken Lon ("D2") and Teng Ai Leng ("D3"). The Plaintiff contends that D1 has defaulted on repayment and now applies for summary judgment on the basis that its claims are clear and undisputed. The defendants oppose the application, contending that genuine legal and factual issues exist which should be tried. This judgment considers whether those issues amount to triable matters or whether summary judgment ought to be granted.

Background Facts

[2] D1 was the customer of the Plaintiff bank, who had applied for the financing of its quarry and building supplies business. By three (3) separate letters of offer dated 6 April 2020, 15 June 2022, and 15 February 2022, the plaintiff extended the following Facilities:

(a) A Commodity Murabahah Term Financing-i (CMTF-i) facility of RM1,000,000.00 under Account No 46342-601200; and

(b) A trade-related facility (LC-i/TR-i/BG-i/IF-i) for the sum of RM1,000,000.00 and


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top