HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SETIA UTAMA LRT3 SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
SIEMENS MOBILITY SDN BHD & ORS AND ANOTHER CASE – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Enclosure 1)
[1] In Originating Summons No WA-24C-22-01/2025 (OS 22), Setia Utama LRT3 Sdn Bhd ("SULSB") had applied to this court under encl 1 (encl 1) to set aside the Adjudication Decision dated 6 January 2025 ("AD") given in favour of Siemens Mobility Sdn Bhd ("SMSB"), Siemens Mobility GMBH ("SGMBH") and Rasma Corporation Sdn Bhd ("RC") who are collectively an unincorporated association (Consortium) pursuant to s 15(b) and (d) of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (CIPAA 2012). SULSB has also applied under this OS 22 in encl 27 for a stay application (encl 27) pending encl 1 being disposed.
[2] On the other hand, Originating Summons No WA-24C-28-02/2025 (OS 28) is in turn an application for the enforcement of the AD by the Consortium in accordance with s 28 CIPAA.
[3] Enclosure 1 in OS 22 is supported by inter alia the following grounds:
3.1 the AD is liable to be set aside as:
3.1.1 the AD was given in excess of the Adjudicator's jurisdiction
3.1.2 the Adjudicator has not acted independently or impartially
3.1.3 the Adjudicator has acted in breach of natural justice
3.2 there has been a denial of natural justice occasioned to SUL
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.