Back
HIGH COURT (SHAH ALAM)
SHAHNAZ SULAIMAN, J
Subang Perdana Management Corporation Court 3-5 – Appellant
Versus
Lee Boon Peng & Anor – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of applications for judicial review. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. first respondent's non-defensive stance. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. grounds for judicial review outlined. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's duty in judicial review. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. criteria for identifying errors in decisions. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. insufficient grounds for review. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. jurisdiction and powers of the second respondent confirmed. (Para 30 , 32 , 36) |
GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT
[1]These five applications for judicial review were heard together, seeking this court to quash the award of the second respondent.
Background
[2]The applicant is the Management Corporation of the development area known as Subang Perdana Goodyear Court 3, Court 4 and Court 5. The first respondent is a resident of Subang Perdana Goodyear Court 4.
[3]There was a total of five applications for judicial review before this court involving the same parties, against five distinctive awards awarded by the second respondent, details of which are as follows:
(i)in case BA-25-46-07/2023 (“No. 46”), the applicant sought a prayer of declaration and certiorari to quash the award given vide Claim No.: TPS/B-5078-11/2022 throug
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
