Subang Perdana Management Corporation Court 3-5 vs Lee Boon Peng & Anor

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Subang Perdana Management Corporation Court 3-5 – Appellant
Versus
Lee Boon Peng & Anor – Respondent

Table of Content
1. judicial review applications for quashing awards. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. grounds for judicial review include illegality, irrationality, etc. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. courts can scrutinize substance and process in judicial reviews. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 16)
4. requirements for substantiating complaints in judicial reviews. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
5. court's authority to uphold or quash tribunal decisions. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
6. interpretation of tribunal powers under the strata management act. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 35)
7. judicial review applications dismissed; costs ordered. (Para 37)

Shahnaz Sulaiman J:

GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT

[1]These five applications for judicial review were heard together, seeking this court to quash the award of the second respondent.

Background

[2]The applicant is the Management Corporation of the development area known as Subang Perdana Goodyear Court 3, Court 4 and Court 5. The first respondent is a resident of Subang Perdana Goodyear Court 4.

[3]There was a total of five applications for judicial review before this court involving the same parties, against five distinctive awards awarded by the second respondent, details of which are as foll

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

Subang Perdana Management Corporation Court 3-5 – AppellantVersusLee Boon Peng & Anor – Respondent

Shahnaz Sulaiman J:

Cases Referred (5)

Subang Perdana Management Corporation Court 3-5 – Appellant
Versus
Lee Boon Peng & Anor – Respondent