Back
Teh Aun Yang (berniaga sebagai pemilik tunggal dengan nama Foo Yuan Food Court) – Appellant
Versus
Wan Chow Seng & Ors – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the tenancy agreements and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. appellant's claims against both 1st, 2nd, and 3rd respondents. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. grounds for 3rd respondent’s striking out application. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. discussion on privity of contract and its implications. (Para 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. court's analysis of duty of care and negligence. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. court’s view on the necessity of duty of care. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 7. limitations on establishing new categories of negligence. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 8. court's conclusion on the absence of a contractual or tortious relationship. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 9. final judgment and costs awarded. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59) |
JUDGMENT
[1]The was an appeal by the Appellant (Plaintiff in the Sessions Court) against the decision of the Sessions Court on 1.11.2021 allowing the 3rd Respondent’s (3rd Defendant in the Sessions Court) application (“3rd Respondent’s Striking Out Application”) to strike out the Appellant’s Amended Writ and Amended Statement of Claim, both dated 1.6.2021 pursuant to Order 18 Rule 19 (1)(a)
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
