Back
HIGH COURT (KUALA LUMPUR)
ROZANA ALI YUSOFF, J
Lonely Planet Inn Sdn Bhd & Ors – Appellant
Versus
Amber Court Management Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interlocutory injunction application details. (Para 1 , 1) |
| 2. background facts and context. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. plaintiffs' grounds for injunction. (Para 8) |
| 4. defendant's counterarguments. (Para 9) |
| 5. court's analysis of injunction criteria. (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. court's decision on balance of convenience. (Para 18) |
[1]This is an application by the Plaintiffs for an Interlocutory Injunction (Enclosure 4) pursuant to Order 29 Rule 1 of the Rules of Court 2012 ( ROC 2012) Section 51 (1)Specific Relief Act 1950interparte on 05.07.2023. The prayers sought by the Plaintiffs are as follows: -
[i]An interim injunction against the Defendant and/or its office bearers and management committee and/or its agents compelling them to grant full access and use of all the lifts and/or staircases in Amber Court Condominium to the Plaintiffs and/or their tenants and/or their occupants with immediate effect pending determination and disposal of this suit;
[ii]An interim injunction against the Defendant and/or its management committee and council members and/or its agents compelling them to issue fully functional electromagnetic access cards to the Plain
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
