FEDERAL COURT (PUTRAJAYA)
TENGKU MAIMUN TUAN MAT, CJ, MOHD ZAWAWI SALLEH, FCJ, IDRUS HARUN, FCJ, NALLINI PATHMANATHAN, FCJ, ABDUL RAHMAN SEBLI, FCJ
Ahmad Zahri bin Mirza Abdul Hamid – Appellant
Versus
Aims Cyberjaya Sdn Bhd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. a determination on employee status. (Para 1) |
| 2. questions regarding employment contract nature. (Para 2) |
| 3. chronological background of employment contracts. (Para 3) |
| 4. findings from industrial court. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 5. findings of fact regarding employment nature. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 6. court of appeal's rationale on corporate veil. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 7. counsel's argument on corporate veil lifting. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 8. legal concept of piercing the corporate veil. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 9. factors for piercing the corporate veil. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 10. corporate relationships and lift necessity. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 11. case law on piercing the corporate veil. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 12. established willingness to pierce the veil. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 13. court of appeal's approach to facts. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 14. jurisdictional scope of veil piercing. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 15. comparing jurisdictional practices. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 16. joint employer concept noted. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 17. legal findings on employer relationships. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 18. recognition of complex employer relationships. (Para 32 , 33) |
| 19. policy considerations for veil piercing. (Para 34 , 35) |
| 20. key factors for judicial consideration. (Para 36 , 37) |
| 21. fixed term contracts |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.