SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 5634

FEDERAL COURT (PUTRAJAYA)
ABANG ISKANDAR ABANG HASHIM, MARY LIM THIAM SUAN, ABU BAKAR JAIS, JJ
Dahlia Dhaima bt Abdullah – Appellant
Versus
Majlis Agama Islam Selangor and another – Respondent


Table of Content
1. status of conversion and circumstantial context. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 10)
2. arguments regarding jurisdiction and conversion validity. (Para 11 , 65 , 67 , 70 , 71)
3. observations on findings from the syariah courts. (Para 15 , 22 , 23 , 24)
4. jurisdiction over apostasy versus ab initio cases. (Para 37 , 42 , 84)
5. final judgment and dismissal of appeals. (Para 155)

[1]Although the dispute in this case concerns the status of a party, it is also related to the larger sphere where different jurisprudence and jurisdiction of the Syariah Courts and the Civil Courts has come to the fore. Though the Syariah Courts and the Civil Courts are well recognised by our own Federal Constitution, the existence of both at the same time in the administration of justice in this country is not without difficulties.

[2]We heard two related appeals against the majority decision of the Court of Appeal in this case. This court had earlier allowed leave to appeal against that majority decision based on the questions of law proposed as follows:

(1)Is the date of the conversion of a person into Islam the date of his or her actual conversion or the date of issuance of a card confirming the fac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top