FEDERAL COURT (PUTRAJAYA)
ABANG ISKANDAR ABANG HASHIM, MARY LIM THIAM SUAN, ABU BAKAR JAIS, JJ
Dahlia Dhaima bt Abdullah – Appellant
Versus
Majlis Agama Islam Selangor and another – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. status of conversion and circumstantial context. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 2. arguments regarding jurisdiction and conversion validity. (Para 11 , 65 , 67 , 70 , 71) |
| 3. observations on findings from the syariah courts. (Para 15 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. jurisdiction over apostasy versus ab initio cases. (Para 37 , 42 , 84) |
| 5. final judgment and dismissal of appeals. (Para 155) |
[1]Although the dispute in this case concerns the status of a party, it is also related to the larger sphere where different jurisprudence and jurisdiction of the Syariah Courts and the Civil Courts has come to the fore. Though the Syariah Courts and the Civil Courts are well recognised by our own Federal Constitution, the existence of both at the same time in the administration of justice in this country is not without difficulties.
[2]We heard two related appeals against the majority decision of the Court of Appeal in this case. This court had earlier allowed leave to appeal against that majority decision based on the questions of law proposed as follows:
(1)Is the date of the conversion of a person into Islam the date of his or her actual conversion or the date of issuance of a card confirming the fac
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.