Martin Bencher (M) Sdn Bhd – Appellant
Versus
Sapura Energy Bhd & Ors – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against high court's order dismissed (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments on abuse of process and creditor's rights (Para 2 , 15 , 16 , 20 , 21) |
| 3. court's reasoning on scheme of arrangement validity (Para 3 , 23 , 29 , 35) |
| 4. legal framework for scheme of arrangement (Para 24 , 25 , 28 , 30) |
| 5. final order affirms high court's decision (Para 135 , 136) |
INTRODUCTION
[1]This appeal is against the dismissal by the High Court of the appellant creditor’s application to be excluded from a proposed scheme of arrangement between the three respondent debtor companies (and 20 other related companies in the group) and their creditors.
[2]The appellant advanced two principal grounds. The first is that the scheme process pursued by the respondents constituted multiplicity of proceedings and was an abuse of process given the existence of an earlier proposed scheme application by the respondents, which also involved applications for restraining orders. Secondly, the appellant’s debts fell outside the specified cut-off date for the filing of a proof of debt, on account of a settlement agreement, which post-dated the cut-off date.
[
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.