SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 6928

Martin Bencher (M) Sdn Bhd – Appellant
Versus
Sapura Energy Bhd & Ors – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal against high court's order dismissed (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments on abuse of process and creditor's rights (Para 2 , 15 , 16 , 20 , 21)
3. court's reasoning on scheme of arrangement validity (Para 3 , 23 , 29 , 35)
4. legal framework for scheme of arrangement (Para 24 , 25 , 28 , 30)
5. final order affirms high court's decision (Para 135 , 136)

Mohd Nazlan JCA (delivering judgment of the court):

INTRODUCTION

[1]This appeal is against the dismissal by the High Court of the appellant creditor’s application to be excluded from a proposed scheme of arrangement between the three respondent debtor companies (and 20 other related companies in the group) and their creditors.

[2]The appellant advanced two principal grounds. The first is that the scheme process pursued by the respondents constituted multiplicity of proceedings and was an abuse of process given the existence of an earlier proposed scheme application by the respondents, which also involved applications for restraining orders. Secondly, the appellant’s debts fell outside the specified cut-off date for the filing of a proof of debt, on account of a settlement agreement, which post-dated the cut-off date.

[

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top