Back
COURT OF APPEAL (PUTRAJAYA)
RAVINTHRAN N PARAMAGURU, JCA, HASHIM HAMZAH, JCA, FAIZAH JAMALUDIN, HCJ
Pesuruhjaya Bangunan Kawasan Pentadbiran Majlis Bandaraya Pulau Pinang – Appellant
Versus
Perbadanan Pengurusan Mar Vista Resort – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of appeal and parties involved (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the appellant's impugned decisions (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. question of law central to the appeal (Para 9) |
| 4. preliminary objections and academic nature of the appeal (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. public interest and importance of legal interpretation (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 24) |
| 6. appellant's argument on statutory powers (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. court's interpretation and findings on statutory powers (Para 82 , 83 , 84 , 86) |
| 8. conclusion and orders of the court (Para 87 , 88 , 89) |
JUDGMENT
INTRODUCTION
[1]This is an appeal by the Pesuruhjaya Bangunan Kawasan Pentadbiran Majlis Bandaraya Pulau Pinang, who is Commissioner of Buildings for the local authority area under the jurisdiction of Majlis Bandaraya Pulau Pinang (“appellant”/ “MBPP-COB”) against part of the Order issued by the Pulau Pinang High Courton 03.04.2023 (the “Order”) in Judicial Review Application No. PA-25-39-08/2022.
[2]The respondent is Perbadanan Pengurusan Mar Vista Resort. It is the management corporation of a subdivided building known as the Mar Vista Resort (“respondent”/ “Mar Vista MC”): it was formed unde
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
