Back
MAHKAMAH SESYEN (KUALA TERENGGANU)
BADRUL MUNIR MOHD HAMDY, J
Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd lwn – Appellant
Versus
Pendakwa Raya – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identifying the incident and responsibility. (Para 1 , 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 2. explaining prima facie burden of proof requirements. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. establishing the legal duty of employers. (Para 14 , 15 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. discussion of the principle of strict liability under akkp. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. the requirement for employer's accountability. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 6. analysis of safety systems and duties. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. inspections and evaluations of safety measures. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. concluding remark on negligence and culpability. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 65) |
| 9. final judgment and sentencing. (Para 136 , 138) |
[1]OKS; Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd (“PCSB”) dituduh di Mahkamah ini atas pertuduhan pindaan (P9) di bawah seksyen 15(1) Akta Keselamatan dan Kesihatan Pekerjaan 1994 1994) seperti berikut:
Bahawa kamu, pada 13 Mac 2014 lebih kurang jam 3:20 petang di RDS Valve Manifold Platform, Petronas Carigali Sdn. Bhd. Onshore Gas Terminal, beralamat di KM106, Jalan Kuantan-Kuala Terengganu, 24300 Kerteh, Kemaman, Terengganu, sebagai majikan, telah gagal untuk memastikan kewajipannya, setakat yang praktik, keselamatan, kesihatan dan kebajikan semasa beker
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
