[1]On 27.12.2024, this Court has dismissed the Plaintiffs’ claim and allowed partly Defendant’s counterclaim. Aggrieved by this decision, both parties are now appealing to the High Court. Below are my grounds of the said decision.

B. BACKGROUND FACTSThe Demised Premises

[2]Both the Plaintiffs are wholly owned subsidiaries of the Pegasus Height Berhad, a public company listed on the Main Market of Bursa Securities Malaysia. The 1^st Plaintiff is the registered owner and proprietor of:

a)a piece of land held under title no. PN 20891 Lot 19980 and PN 20890 Lot 19981, Mukim Ampangan, Seremban District, Negeri Sembilan (Land); and

b)a three and a half storey shopping complex building known as Seremban Centerpoint Mall erected on the said Land and located at 33, Jalan Dato Siamang Gagap, 70100, Seremban (Seremban Centerpoint Mall).

[3]The 1^st Plaintiff and 2^nd Plaintiff had entered into a tenancy agreement dated 1.3.2015 (MasterTenancy Agreement) that the 1^st Plaintiff as the landlord of Land agreed to let the whole of Seremban Centerpoint Mall to the 2^nd Plaintiff on the terms and conditions stipulated in the Master Tenancy Agreement.

[4]According to Clause 5.6 of Master Tenancy Agreement, the