Anthony John Dason lwn vs Wong Kean Yen dan lain-lain

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

MAHKAMAH SESYEN (KUALA LUMPUR)
ZAMAN MOHD NOOR, J
Anthony John Dason lwn – Appellant
Versus
Wong Kean Yen dan lain-lain – Respondent

Table of Content
1. defendants seek to strike out application. (Para 1 , 1)
2. details of fee arrangement and payments. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. discussion on legality of fee agreements. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
4. judicial framework evaluation of agreements. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
5. analysis of contingent fee agreements. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
6. illegality effect on contract legitimacy. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46)
7. final ruling and dismissal of claims. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51)

[1]Defendan Pertama memohon Mahkamah Sesyen di Kuala Lumpur pada hari bulan 2025 pada pukul pagi/petang untuk mendengar permohonan Defendan Pertama menurut inter alia Aturan 18 Kaedah 19(1)(b), 19(1)(c) dan 19(1)(d), Aturan 92 Kaedah 4 Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012

1.Writ dan Pernyataan Tuntutan Plaintif bertarikh 28/10/2024 dibatalkan terhadap Defendan Pertama;

2.Bahawa Writ dan Pernyataan Tuntutan Plaintif bertarikh 28/10/2024 dibatalkan atas alasan bahawa ia mengaibkan, remeh atau menyusahkan;

3.Bahawa Writ dan Pernyataan Tuntutan Plaintif bertarikh 28/10/2024 dibatalkan atas alasan bahawa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

MAHKAMAH SESYEN (KUALA LUMPUR)ZAMAN MOHD NOOR, JAnthony John Dason lwn – AppellantVersusWong Kean Yen dan lain-lain – Respondent

MAHKAMAH SESYEN (KUALA LUMPUR)
ZAMAN MOHD NOOR, J
Anthony John Dason lwn – Appellant
Versus
Wong Kean Yen dan lain-lain – Respondent