Back
SESSION COURT (KUALA LUMPUR)
AZURA ALWI, J
Casmet Sdn Bhd – Appellant
Versus
Nte Engineering Sdn Bhd and another suit – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contractual relationships and appointment of contractors. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. trial procedures and outcomes of claims. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. witnesses introduced and their qualifications. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 4. stipulated contractual agreements and issues for trial. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 5. validation of work done by plaintiffs through evidence. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. evaluation of amounts claimed and contested by the defendant. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. defendant's claims regarding breach and responsibility. (Para 24 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. assessment of evidence regarding delays and liability. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 9. limits of defendant's claims and evidentiary requirements. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
Background of facts
[1]The Defendant was appointed as the main contractor for a project known as “Cadangan Pembangunan (Fasa 2) Yang Mengandungi 2 Blok Pangsapuri: (1) Blok A Pangsapuri 17 Tingkat (240) Unit, (2) Blok B Pangsapuri 14 Tingkat (195 Unit) dengan Kemudahan Podium 4 Tingkat Tempat Letak Kereta dan Kemudahan Penduduk di atas Lot PT 23171 dan Sebahagian Lot 40209, Taman Bullion Mewah, Off Lebuhraya Kuala Lumpur-Karak,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
