SESSIONS COURT (SEREMBAN)
MOHAMAD KAMIL NIZAM, CJ
Lee Soo Ming & Anor – Appellant
Versus
Palm Springs Development Sdn Bhd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendant's application for transfer (Para 5) |
| 3. court's analysis on factors for transfer (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. principles guiding transfer decision (Para 12 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
[1]This is an application by the Defendant under Order 2 Rule, Order 3 Rule 5, Order 57 Rule 1 and Rule 2 and Order 92 Rule 4 of the Rules of Court 2012 to transfer this proceeding to the Sessions Court at Petaling Jaya, in the state of Selangor. The relevant cause papers for this application are:
a)Writ of Summons and Statement of Claims dated 4.8.2023 (“Enclosure 1 and 2”);
b)Statement of Defence dated 25.8.2023 (“Enclosure 5”);
c)Amended Writ of Summons and Statement of Claims dated 8.9.2023 (“Enclosure 6 and 7”);
d)Amended Statement of Defence and Counter Claim dated
e)10.2023 (“Enclosure 12”);
f)Reply to the Statement of Defence and Defence to Amended Counter Claim dated 31.10.2023 (“Enclosure 14”);
g)Notice of Application dated 25.04.2024 (“Enclosure 20”);
h)Affidavit In Support of the application affirmed by Khoay Ghee Teong dated 24.4.2024 (“Enclosure 21”);
i)Plaintiffs Affidavit In Reply affirmed by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.