Back
SESSIONS COURT (SEREMBAN)
MAIMOONAH AID, J
Pendakwa Raya – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Haq bin Abdul Razak – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused charged with wildlife conservation violation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. accused's mitigation plea and prosecutor's rebuttal. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. principles guiding sentencing and public interest. (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's decision to impose appropriate sentence. (Para 9 , 22 , 28) |
| 5. importance of deterrent sentencing for wildlife offences. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
Grounds of SentencingIntroduction
[1]The accused was charged with an offence under section 69(1) Wildlife Conservation Act 2010
[2]The charge read as follows:
Bahawa kamu pada 06 Jun 2018, jam lebih kurang 2.00 petang, di dalam sebuah kenderaan jenis Perodua Axia WC5455W di kawasan parkir kenderaan di Seremban Gateway, dalam Daerah Seremban, dalam negeri Negeri Sembilan telah didapati menyimpan satu (1) ekor anak Ungka Tangan Putih, White handed Gibbon (Hylobates lar) iaitu hidupan liar yang dilindungi sepenuhnya yang tersenarai di dalam Jadual Kedua yang tidak matang, Akta Pemuliharaan Hidupan Liar Tahun 2010 [Akta 716] tanpa permit khas. Oleh yang demikian, kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan di bawah Seksyen 69(1)dan boleh dikenakan hukuman di bawah Seksyen dan Akta yang sama.
[3]The charge was
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
