SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 5257

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
IOUPAY LIMITED & ORS – Appellant
Versus
KUAN CHOON HSUING & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Polwin Sua Shiang-Nian,Mohd Irwan Ismail ,Respondent Advocate: Na Wee Jern

JUDGMENT

Atan Mustaffa Yussof Ahmad J:

[1] Before the court is an application by the Plaintiffs seeking leave to use documents and information obtained pursuant to an Anton Piller order in one action for various other ongoing and prospective legal proceedings, including criminal proceedings.

Background Facts

[2] On 17 March 2023, IOUPay Limited, Isentric Sdn Bhd, IOU Pay (Asia) Sdn Bhd and Datamorph Services Sdn Bhd (collectively "the Plaintiffs") commenced legal proceedings against the 1st to 4th Defendants, Kuan Choon Hsuing, Yong Yuen Yeen, Yong Yuen Nee and Aspire Project Management Sdn Bhd ("D1, D2, D3 and D4" respectively). On 29 February 2024, Edward Tan Tee Tong, Liew Jwo and Wang Ern Wei were added as the 5th, 6th and 7th Defendants respectively ("D5, D6 and D7" respectively).

[3] On 21 March 2023, the High court granted an Anton Piller Order against D1 to D4 pursuant to the Plaintiffs' ex-parte application dated 17 March 2023. Following an inter partes hearing, the Anton Piller Order was confirmed on 7 September 2023. D1 to D4 have filed an appeal against this decision in the court of Appeal (Civil Appeal No.: W-02(IM)(NCC)-1646-10/2023).

[4] The Anton Piller Order was executed


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top