SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 5127

HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK KUCHING
PP – Appellant
Versus
MARZUKI BOLHASSAN – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Aida Nurdiana Che Kamarulzaman ,Respondent Advocate: Osman Ibrahim,Luqman

JUDGMENT

Faridz Gohim Abdullah J:

A. Introduction

[1] The accused, Marzuki bin Bolhassan, is charged with two (2) counts of offences under s 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 punishable under subsection 39B(2) of the same Act and s 6 of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 and punishable under subsection 39A(2) of the same Act.

[2] Having heard and considered the submission provided by both parties and having given a maximum evaluation of the evidence adduced by the Prosecution, I am satisfied that the Prosecution has failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused on both charges. In the circumstances, the accused was acquitted and discharged without calling for his defence.

[3] Below are the grounds for my decision.

B. The Charges

[4] The charges preferred against the accused are as follows:

(a) First Charge [s 39B(1)(a) DDA]

"That you, on 23 December 2020, at about 1845 hrs, at the house No 19, Lorong 1D, Jalan Sultan Tengah, Taman Pelita Jaya 5, in the district of Kuching, in the state of Sarawak, did traffic in dangerous drugs, to wit, 954.3 grammes of Cannabis, thereby you have committed an offence under s 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, punishable under s 39B(2)


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top