COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
YAP CHIN WAH – Appellant
Versus
MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN MALAYSIA & ANOR AND OTHER APPEALS – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1] There are four (4) appeals before us, namely:
(a) Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No W-01(A)-603-11/2023
Yap Chin Wah v. Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia & Another;
(b) Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No W-01(A)-604-11/2023
Lee Khurn Ying v. Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia & Another;
(c) Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No W-01(A)-607-11/2023
Mohamad Nazly Bin Nasir Mohamad v. Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia & Another; and
(d) Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No W-01(A)-608-11/2023
Chairil Bahari Bin Ibrahim v. MMSB Consult Sdn Bhd & Another.
[2] The Appellants in each appeal were employed as resident engineers on a "fixed-term" contract of employment by MMSB Consult Sdn Bhd. The Appellants were retrenched from employment. They disputed the retrenchment and filed complaints with the Director General of Industrial Relations ("DGIR") under s 20 of the Industrial Relations Act 1967, claiming that they had been dismissed, without just cause or excuse. There was no resolution or amicable settlement of the disputes before the DGIR.
[3] As such, the complaints were referred to the Industrial Court for adjudication. In the proceedings before the Industrial Court , the App
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.