SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 5233

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SAFEMINE MINERALS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TEE JOO TEIK – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Iffahhizwani ,Respondent Advocate: Justin Voon,Tan Ko Xin

JUDGMENT

Leong Wai Hong J:

[Summary Judgment]

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal to me by the appellant against a Sessions Court 's order granting summary judgment in favour of the respondent for the sum of RM 600,000.00 with interest and RM 3,000.00 costs.

[2] The order of the Sessions Court dated 6 June 2024 can be seen in the Record of Appeal Part A [Enclosure 3] at pp 10 - 11. The Grounds of Judgment of the Sessions Court can be seen in the Additional Record of Appeal [Enclosure 4] at pp 3 to 28.

[3] The appellant is the defendant and the respondent the plaintiff at the Sessions Court . For ease of reference, parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant in my Grounds.

Loan

[4] The plaintiff is the executor of the Estate of Bong Yam Keng (Deceased) ("BYK").

[5] The plaintiff's claim is premised on the non-repayment of a loan of RM600,000.00 given by the late BYK to the defendant. The loan is evidenced by a Payment Voucher dated 29 November 2017 issued by BYK to the defendant.

[For the Payment Voucher see Record of Appeal encl 3 at p 64 and the Plaintiff's Supporting Affidavit encl 3 at p 44 para 7]

Security For Repayment

[6] As a security for repayment, the defendant issued


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top