HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SAFEMINE MINERALS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TEE JOO TEIK – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[Summary Judgment]
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal to me by the appellant against a Sessions Court 's order granting summary judgment in favour of the respondent for the sum of RM 600,000.00 with interest and RM 3,000.00 costs.
[2] The order of the Sessions Court dated 6 June 2024 can be seen in the Record of Appeal Part A [Enclosure 3] at pp 10 - 11. The Grounds of Judgment of the Sessions Court can be seen in the Additional Record of Appeal [Enclosure 4] at pp 3 to 28.
[3] The appellant is the defendant and the respondent the plaintiff at the Sessions Court . For ease of reference, parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant in my Grounds.
Loan
[4] The plaintiff is the executor of the Estate of Bong Yam Keng (Deceased) ("BYK").
[5] The plaintiff's claim is premised on the non-repayment of a loan of RM600,000.00 given by the late BYK to the defendant. The loan is evidenced by a Payment Voucher dated 29 November 2017 issued by BYK to the defendant.
[For the Payment Voucher see Record of Appeal encl 3 at p 64 and the Plaintiff's Supporting Affidavit encl 3 at p 44 para 7]
Security For Repayment
[6] As a security for repayment, the defendant issued
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.