SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 5230

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
PATRICIA PAULINE MARIASOOSAY – Appellant
Versus
RAVENDRAN RAMASAMY; ADRIAN SUNIL GEORGE GEORGE (PARTY CITED) (ENCL 8.... – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Julie Lack J:

Introduction

[1] This was an application by the petitioner Wife (PW) in Encl 96 pursuant to s 103 of the Law Reform (Marriage & Divorce) Act 1976 and/or the inherent powers of this court to restrain the respondent Husband (RH) from entering into the matrimonial home to molest, harass or threaten the PW until the final disposal of the petition for divorce.

Brief Background

[2] The PW and RH were legally married on 31 March 2001 and have 2 Children, both daughters. The eldest child (22 years old) is currently studying in Australia and the younger child (19 years old) lives with the PW and studies in a local college.

[3] After their marriage the parties lived for a while together in Singapore where the RH works as a pilot with Singapore Airlines. In the year 2003 the PW resigned from her job as an air stewardess and returned to Malaysia to become a full time home maker.

[4] In 2006 the PW and the children moved to the matrimonial home at Bandar Sunway, Petaling Jaya, Selangor while the RH continued to be based in Singapore due to his nature of work. On his off days he will come back to Malaysia and be with the family.

[5] The matrimonial home was bought in their joint n


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top