COURT OF APPEAL (PUTRAJAYA)
RAVINTHRAN N PARAMUGURU, LIM CHONG FONG, CHOO KAH SING, JJ
Ho Sue San @ David Ho Sue San – Appellant
Versus
Hovid Bhd & Ors – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the shareholder dispute and company details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background on company structure and shareholder relations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 17) |
| 3. initiation of oppression action and specific claims made. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. grounds of judgment and findings of the high court. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. review of equitable bargain and oppressive conduct analysis. (Para 25 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. analysis of equitable considerations in shareholder disputes. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 7. judicial norms on equitable rights of shareholders. (Para 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 8. outcomes of joint ventures and management controls. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 9. third respondent's handling of confidential information. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 10. critical observations on judicial commissioner's findings. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 11. importance of agreements and shareholder expectations. (Para 54 , 55) |
| 12. need for appellate intervention based on judicial misdirection. (Para 56 , 57) |
| 13. final judgments and orders of the appellate court. (Para 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
GROUNDS OF JUDGM ENT
(DISSENTING)
INTRODUCTION
[1]Th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.