Back
COURT OF APPEAL (PUTRAJAYA)
ABDUL RAHMAN SEBLI,, MARY LIM THIAM SUAN, J, HASNAH MOHAMMED HASHIM, JJCA
KNM Process Systems Sdn Bhd – Appellant
Versus
Lukoil Uzbekistan Operating Company LLC – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and contractual background (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. respondent's counterarguments against unconscionability (Para 8 , 22 , 23) |
| 3. arguments on injunction validity and abuse of process (Para 9) |
| 4. high court’s findings and reasoning (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. appellant's complaints regarding contract terms (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. respondent's denial of obligations under contracts (Para 24 , 25) |
| 7. sanctions and their relevance to the case (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. legal provisions regarding interim measures (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 9. tests for granting interim reliefs (Para 33 , 34) |
| 10. court's perspective on arbitration and interim relief (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 11. establishing fraud and unconscionability (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 12. considerations for unconscionability claims (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 13. details and interpretations of guarantees (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 14. implications of bad faith in guarantee calls (Para 64 , 65) |
| 15. importance of contractual terms in the analysis (Para 67 , 68) |
| 16. assessing the validity of calls on guarantees (Para 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73) |
| 17. final observations on warranty guarantees (Para 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78) |
| 18. c |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
