SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 6650

COURT OF APPEAL (PUTRAJAYA)
AZIZAH NAWAWI, J, SEE MEE CHUN, J, LIM CHONG FONG, JJCA
Etiqa Family Takaful Bhd (previously known as Etiqa Takaful Bhd) – Appellant
Versus
Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri and another – Respondent


Advocates:
S Saravana Kumar (with Yap Wen Hui) (Rosli Dahlan Saravana Partnership) in Civil Appeal No W-01(A)-726–09 of 2022 for the appellant.
Ashrina bt Ramzan Ali (with Surani bt Che Ismail) (Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia) in Civil Appeal No W-01(A)-726–09 of 2022 for the respondent.
Ashrina bt Ramzan Ali (with Surani bt Che Ismail) (Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia) in Civil Appeal No W-01(A)-746–10 of 2022 for the appellant.
S Saravana Kumar (with Yap Wen Hui) (Rosli Dahlan Saravana Partnership) in Civil Appeal No W-01(A)-746–10 of 2022 for the respondent.

See Mee Chun JCA

(delivering majority judgment of the court):

INTRODUCTION

[1]There are two appeals being heard together. Appeal 726 is the appeal of Etiqa Family Takaful Bhd (‘taxpayer’) against the decision of the High Court (‘HC’) dismissing its appeal for year of assessment (‘YA’) 2011, 2012 and 2013. Appeal 746 is the appeal by the Director General of Inland Revenue (‘Revenue’) against the decision of the HC in allowing the taxpayer’s appeal for YAs 2008, 2009 and 2010.

[2]The taxpayer is in the principal business of managing the general and family takaful business. From 1 December 2007, the taxpayer also commenced managing takaful investment-linked business upon the transfer of the takaful assets, liabilities and business of Maybank Takaful Bhd to it.

BACKGROUND FACTS

[3]The Revenue raised notices of additional assessment (Form JA) for YAs 2008 to 2013 with additional tax payable and penalties as set out below:

DateYAAdditional assessment including penalties
18 July 20162008RM2,624,936.97
30 December 20162009RM3,589,065.87
30 December 20162010RM6,279,723.89
27 December 20162011RM10,383,369.25
28 December 2062012RM26,007,964.73
28 December 20162013RM26.810,914.96

The taxpayer being aggriev

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top