Back
HIGH COURT (KUALA LUMPUR)
MARY LIM, J
Ranhill E & C Sdn Bhd – Appellant
Versus
Tioxide (M) Sdn Bhd and other – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case summary and introductory information (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. facts about the contractual relationship (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. adjudication process and claims (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. rulings on jurisdiction and claims (Para 18 , 21 , 22 , 29) |
| 5. arguments regarding jurisdiction and natural justice (Para 24 , 30 , 31 , 46) |
| 6. understanding of court's view on adjudication (Para 59 , 63 , 72) |
| 7. final ruling and order (Para 105 , 106) |
GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1]These four applications are heard together. Two of them, Originating Summons No: 24C-15-04/2015 and Originating Summons No. 24C-11-04/2015 concern an adjudication decision made by IR Leon Weng Seng on 6.4.2015. The other two Originating Summonses Nos. 24C-16-05/2015 and 24C-9-04/2015 concern an adjudication decision made by Murelidaran M Navaratnam on 30.3.2015.
[2]All four Originating Summons were heard together. It makes every good sense since these cases concern the same primary parties who had entered into two separate yet related contracts. The disputes that arose between them went to two separate adjudications, both of which are under challenge. Ranhill E&C Sdn Bhd [Ranhill], the su
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
