Back
HIGH COURT (KUALA LUMPUR)
ALIZA SULAIMAN, J
MRCB Builders Sdn Bhd – Appellant
Versus
China State Construction Engineering (M) Sdn Bhd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of applications filed by the plaintiff. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. background facts regarding the parties and project. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 3. details of disputes and claims initiated by the defendant. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. court's observations on preliminary issues raised. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. analysis of whether the adjudication proceedings are for fraud. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 6. judgment on established fraud impacting adjudication. (Para 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 7. court's conclusion and order regarding plaintiffs applications. (Para 46) |
GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1]There were two applications by the Plaintiff.
[2]In the first application (encl. 1) pursuant to ss 2535Courts of Judicature Act 1964Act 91] (‘CJA 1964’) and O. 92, r. 4 of the Rules of Court 2012RC 2012’), the Plaintiff prayed for, among others, –
(a)a declaration that –
(i)the reference of dispute to adjudication by the Defendant by way of Notice of Adjudication dated 28.9.2022 (‘Notice of Adjudication’) and registered as AIAC/D/ADJ-4498- 2022 (‘Adjudication Proce
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
