SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 6452

HIGH COURT (JOHOR BAHRU)
ABDUL MALIK ISHAK, J
DUSUN DESARU SDN BHD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
WANG AH YU & ORS – Respondent




ABDUL MALIK ISHAK J

: Mr Mohd Fairuz bin Abdullah, learned counsel for the plaintiffs, was magnanimous enough to withdraw the originating summons against the first to the fifth defendants on 26 November 1998, and an order to that effect was made with costs, tobe assessed. The application for leave to cease the originating summons against the first to the fifth defendants can be seen in encl 14 which was supported by an affidavit of Lim Yuk Lan, a director of the plaintiffs, and an individual authorized to affirmthe affidavit in support as seen in encl 13 which was affirmed on 7 November 1998. In encl 13 at para 5, there was an intimation that the plaintiffs, through their solicitors by a letter dated 1 October 1998, labelled as ‘without prejudice’, addressedto the solicitors of the first to fifth defendants, had proposed a settlement to these proceedings. But the plaintiffs were still keen to proceed against the sixth defendant, one Wang Boon Kang, and for that reason, the hearing ofencl 5 was adjourned to 22 December 1998. As Mr Ng Chew Hor, counsel for the sixth defendant, had to proceed to the Singapore National Eye Centre for treatment on 22 December 1998, the hearing of encl 5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top