Back
HIGH COURT (KUALA LUMPUR)
ROZ MAWAR ROZAIN, JC
Shining Crest Sdn Bhd – Appellant
Versus
Emerald Unity Sdn Bhd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defendant's application to strike out plaintiff's claim (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background facts on the plaintiff and loan agreement (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. previous legal actions related to consent judgment (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. challenges to the r&m's appointment and related suits (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. hpw’s suit and findings on locus standi (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. subsequent actions regarding auction and legal representation (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. plaintiff seeking to invalidate consent judgment (Para 27 , 28) |
| 8. court's consideration of defendant's strike-out application (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 9. determination of locus standi (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 10. application of res judicata (Para 36 , 37) |
| 11. plaintiff's claims barred by res judicata (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 12. claim deemed time-barred (Para 41 , 42) |
| 13. procedural requirements for set aside of judgment (Para 43 , 44) |
| 14. application of laches (Para 45 , 46) |
| 15. lack of merits in plaintiff's claims (Para 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 16. consent judgment's validity and basis (Para 51 , 52) |
| 17. principles governing striking out (Para 53 , 54) |
GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT
[1]On 19.8.2024 this Court allo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
