Hayatul Akmal Abdul Aziz J:

JUDGMENT

(Enclosure 161)

[1]The first defendant (D1) had, on 02.11.2022, applied to strike out paragraphs 103 to 122 and 141(a) to (d) of the amended Statement of Claim (ASoC) dated 12.07.2021 under O.18 r.19 (1)(b), (c) and/or (d) Rules of Court 2012 (RC 2012)

[2]Enclosure 161 reads:

1.That paragraphs 103 to 122 and 141(a) to (d) of the Amended Statement of Claim dated 12th July 2021 (“ASoC”) be struck-out and dismissed against the 1^st Defendant under Order 18 Rules 19(1)(b), (c) and/ or (d) of the Rules of Court 2012 and/ or the inherent jurisdiction of this Honourable Court.

2.In the alternative, paragraphs 103 to 122 and 141(a) to (d) of the ASoC, insofar as they relate to the 1^st, 2^nd, 3^rd, 5^th, 6^th, 7^th, 8^th, 10^th, 18^th, 19^th, 21^st, 22^nd, 23^rd, 24^th, 25^th, 26^th, 27^th, 29^th, 30^th, 31^st, 34^th, 35^th, 36^th, 37^th, 38^th, 39^th, 40^th, 43^rd, 46^th, 47^th, 51^st, 52^nd, 57^th, 58^th, 59^th, 60^th, 61^st, 62^nd, 63^rd, 64^th, 65^th, 66^th, 68^th, 69^th, 71^st, 72^nd, 76^th, 77^th, 78^th, 81^st, 82^nd, 83^rd, 84^th, 86^th, 87^th, 88^th, 91^st, 94^th, 95^th, 96^th, 97^th, 103^rd, 104^th, 106^th, 107^th, 110^th, 111^th, 112^th, 113^th, 114^th, 115^th, 116^th, 117^th, 118^th, 119^th, 120^th, 121^st and 122^nd Plaintif