HIGH COURT (KUALA LUMPUR)
SU TIANG JOO, J
Felcra Bhd – Appellant
Versus
Adli Sharidan bin Sahar & Ors – Respondent
GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT
Of equal importance, the public too must be able to depend on the honesty and integrity of all practitioners in the legal profession which plays an indispensable role in the administration of justice and conduct of matters in law for members of the public*.
(*as per Vernon Ong JCA (later FCJ) in Majlis Peguam v Lim Yin Yin (CA) para [28])
Introduction
[1]In undertaking a housing project, the plaintiff entrusted the seven defendants, four of whom were advocates and solicitors, two were law firms and one who was alleged to be held out to be a partner of one of the law firms, to handle the conveyancing aspect including collecting the purchase price and loan sums for its benefit. The plaintiff sued for inter alia breach of contract and trust and negligence for the monies which ought to have been received by the defendants and remitted to it, general, aggravated and exemplary damages, interest on the monies and damages together with costs on an indemnity basis. After a trial conducted over 12 days, judgment was pronounced in favour of the plaintiff and these are the grounds for the decision made.
[2]In this judgment, the following issues, which are not fre
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.