HIGH COURT (SHAH ALAM)
NURULHUDA NUR’AINI MOHAMAD NOR, JC
Md Nasir Uddin – Appellant
Versus
Public Prosecutor – Respondent
JUGDMENT
Background
[1]The applicant and another person are charged with 2 charges of smuggling migrants under section 26AAnti-Trafficking In Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007 (ATIPSOM)section 34Penal Code
[2]Section 26ATIPSOM26A. Offence of smuggling of migrants Any person who carries out smuggling of migrants commits an offence and shall, on conviction, be punished with imprisonment for a term not exceeding fifteen years, and shall also be liable to fine, or to both.
[3]The migrants involved are 3 and 5 individuals of Bangladesh national respectively. The applicant himself is a Bangladeshi whilst the other accused is a Malaysian.
[4]The said charges are pending for trial before this Court. As the said charges under section 26Ast schedule of SOSMA, by virtue of section 13SOSMA
[5]Section 13SOSMA
“13. Bail.
(1)Bail shall not be granted to a person who has been charged with a security offence.
(2)Notwithstanding subsection (1)-
(a)A person below the age of eighteen years;
(b)A woman; or
(c)A sick or an infirm person,
charged with a security offence, other than an offence under Chapter VIA of the Penal Code and the Special Measures Against Terrorism
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.