James Foong JCA (delivering judgment fo the court):

INTRODUCTION

We heard this appeal on 23 January 2007, and unanimously dismissed it with costs. We now give our reasons. Before we do so, the following are the brief facts of the case.

FACTS

The respondent was at all material time an employee of the appellant. She was then 47 years of age and had been with the appellant for 11 years before she was dismissed on 6 July 1999. The reason for her dismissal was that she was found fighting with another employee of the appellant on 15 June 1999 in the appellant's premises. This other employee was none other than her own niece, Julie, who was then 17 years of age. Julie was also dismissed by the appellant. Before dismissing the respondent, the appellant held a domestic inquiry that found her in breach of the appellant's rules and regulations of employment and recommended her dismissal. Dissatisfied with this decision, the respondent made representation under s 20(3)Industrial Relations Act 1967 compensation in lieu of reinstatement to be paid to the respondent. The appellant, dissatisfied with this outcome, appealed to us.

OUR REASONS

We approach this appeal by first examining whether the learned