Ahmad Fairuz bin Zainol Abidin J:

GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT

Introduction

[1] This judgment concerns the following four (4) appeals filed by the 3^rd to 7^th Defendants (“the Banks”) against this Court’s decision with regards to the enclosures below:

i.Enclosure 45: An application filed by Lo Hooi Lin and Maznah binti Baba i.e. the 3^rd and 4^th Alleged Contemnors to set aside ex-parte leave for committal dated 20.1.2016 obtained by the Banks;

ii.Enclosure 47: An application filed by the 2^nd Defendant i.e. the 2^nd Alleged Contemnor (“Pavilion Yields”) to set aside ex-parte leave for committal dated 20.1.2016 obtained by the Banks;

iii.Enclosure 61: An application filed by Tan Sri Dato’ Lim Cheng Pow, the 1^st Alleged Contemnor (“Tan Sri Lim”) to set aside ex-parte leave for committal dated 20.1.2016 obtained by the Banks; and

iv.Enclosure 38: The Banks’ application for a committal order against the alleged contemnors.

[2] On 23.10.2019, this Court allowed enclosures 45, 47 and 61 with costs. Consequently, enclosure 38 falls and was struck out. Given the fact that enclosure 38 was not heard on merits and the striking out was merely a consequential order, this judgment will only concern enclosures 45, 4