COURT OF APPEAL (PUTRAJAYA)
SEE MEE CHUN, J, WONG KIAN KHEONG, J, ISMAIL BRAHIM, JJCA
Capital City Property Sdn Bhd – Appellant
Versus
Teh Swee Neo & Anor – Respondent
JUDGMENT A. Novel issues
[1]This case discusses whether the court could pierce the corporate veil of one company (Company X) and impose liability incurred by Company X on another company (Company Y) when -
(1) Company Y had developed commercial lots in a shopping mall (Lots) and sold the Lots to various purchasers (Purchasers);
(2) the Purchasers and Company X had entered into tenancy agreements wherein the Purchasers rented the Lots to Company X (Tenancy Agreements);
(3) Company X was liable to the Purchasers for the unpaid rent of the Lots under the Tenancy Agreements (Unpaid Rent);
(4) Company Y was not a party to the Tenancy Agreements;
(5) the Purchasers had obtained a final judgment against Company X for the Unpaid Rent [Purchasers’ Final Judgment (Company X)]; and
(6) Company X is solvent; and
(7) the Purchasers’ Final Judgment (Company X) is not a “paper judgment” and can be executed against Company X.
The above question also discusses the following matters -
(a)with regard to a group of companies [Group (Companies)], in view of the separate legal personality of each member company in the Group (Companies) as well as the right of the Group (Companies) to arrange
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.