Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
CHOONG YEOW CHOY, J
HALIZA ABD HAMID & ORS – Appellant
Versus
ROGAYAH DIN & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of the factual nexus between developer, landowner, and the prior consent judgment. (Para 1 , 2 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 2. contention regarding the binding nature of the consent judgment versus the bona fide developer defense. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 3. bona fide belief and indefeasibility of title protect innocent developers from undisclosed claims. (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 4. a consent judgment remains binding on parties despite subsequent conflicting commercial arrangements. (Para 63 , 64 , 65 , 66) |
| 5. final orders enforcing the consent judgment against the primary party and dismissing claims against third-party developers. (Para 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75) |
JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1] This action concerns a residential development undertaken on a parcel of vacant agricultural land in Seberang Perai Utara, Pulau Pinang, and raises fundamental questions as to whether a licensed developer, who acted in rel
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
