SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENTBY: WILLAN, CJ

The appellant, a youth of eighteen years of age, was charged with, and pleaded guilty to, the offence of carrying arms contrary to section 3 (1) of the Public Order and Safety Proclamation No. 50, promulgated on the 31st of January, 1946. Section 3 (1) reads as follows:--

Any person who carries arms shall on conviction be punishable with

death or with penal servitude for life or with imprisonment for a term

which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to a fine.

In the same proclamation "arms" is defined as including "any fire-arm, air-gun, air-pistol, automatic gun, automatic pistol and any other kind of gun or pistol from which any shot, bullet or other missile can be discharged or noxious fumes can be emitted, and any kind of fire-arm whether of the same kind as those enumerated or not and also includes any hand grenade".

The facts of this appeal are that the appellant was challenged by a Detective Sub-Inspector at 9.40 p.m. on the 1st May, 1946, on a road which lay on the outskirts of the town of Ipoh. When challenged the appellant at once threw a revolver on the ground and tried to make away. The Detective Sub-Inspector arre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top