SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Sharma J:

The principal claim of the plaintiff in this suit is for an injunction and a declaration. The facts are not very much in dispute. The plaintiff is the tenant of the ground floor of premises No. 139 Jalan Bunga Raya of which the defendant is the landlord and the owner. The defendant occupies the first floor of the same premises. The plaintiff, throughout the period of her tenancy, has had use of water, the kitchen, the bathroom and the toilet on the ground floor. On or about the 7 March 1970 the defendant cut off the water supply to the plaintiff by locking up the water tap. The result of this was obvious. The plaintiff from that moment onwards was forced to get her supplies of water from elsewhere and it was fortunate for her that she was able to do so from the house next door, i.e. premises No. 137 Jalan Bunga Raya. On 4 April 1970 the defendant demolished the bathroom and on 31 May 1970 constructed a door on the ground floor whereby she cut off the rear portion of the ground door from the portion in the physical occupation of the plaintiff. The defendant locked this door which meant that the plaintiff and all the members of her family were deprived of the use o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top