JUDGMENT
Sharma J:
The principal claim of the plaintiff in this suit is for an injunction and a declaration. The facts are not very much in dispute. The plaintiff is the tenant of the ground floor of premises No. 139 Jalan Bunga Raya of which the defendant is the landlord and the owner. The defendant occupies the first floor of the same premises. The plaintiff, throughout the period of her tenancy, has had use of water, the kitchen, the bathroom and the toilet on the ground floor. On or about the 7 March 1970 the defendant cut off the water supply to the plaintiff by locking up the water tap. The result of this was obvious. The plaintiff from that moment onwards was forced to get her supplies of water from elsewhere and it was fortunate for her that she was able to do so from the house next door, i.e. premises No. 137 Jalan Bunga Raya. On 4 April 1970 the defendant demolished the bathroom and on 31 May 1970 constructed a door on the ground floor whereby she cut off the rear portion of the ground door from the portion in the physical occupation of the plaintiff. The defendant locked this door which meant that the plaintiff and all the members of her family were deprived of the use o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.