JUDGMENT
Suffian LP:
This criminal trial has given us a great deal of trouble, and consequently we are taking the unusual step of delivering three separate judgments. Both my learned brethren are not here, and in their absence I shall read first the judgment of the learned Chief Justice and then that of my brother Ali, followed finally by mine. Lee Hun Hoe CJ (Borneo) (read by Suffian LP): This is an appeal against conviction and sentence. The appeal raises important questions concerning the right to appeal against conviction after a plea of guilty and the rules relating to the plea of autrefois acquit.
On 14 July 1972 appellant and Tan Soo Har were jointly charged before the late Sharma J in the High Court at Ipoh for an offence under s. 3 of the Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act, No. 37 of 1971. The trial was before a jury. At the conclusion of the trial appellant was acquitted but Tan Soo Har was convicted. The latter appealed to this Court against his conviction. On 4 December 1972 this Court allowed his appeal declaring that his trial was a nullity. No reason was given in the record before us and the order simply reads -
This Court both declare that the trial of the appella
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.