SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Suffian LP:

The question in this appeal is: was the first defendant (a Telecoms Department mechanic) a servant or agent of the Federal Government the second defendant (respondent before us) at the material" time?

On 30 June 1970 the plaintiff (appellant before us) was riding his motor cycle along Jalan Endau, Mersing, in the direction of Endau, Johore, when he was run into and knocked down and injured by a Telecoms. Department Land Rover at the 1'bc milestone. The Land Rover was driven by the first defendant.

The plaintiff sued the two defendants for damages, alleging that the first defendant was negligent and that the first defendant was the servant or agent of the Government.

The learned trial Judge found that the first defendant was negligent and liable. The learned trial Judge said that from a starting position on the grass verge outside his house the first defendant had made a sharp U-turn without regard to the traffic coming from behind him and he had therefore constituted such an obstruction as to cause the plaintiff to collide into him and fall. This finding of negligence on the part of the first defendant has not been challenged.

What however is challenged is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top