SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Wan Suleiman FJ:

Civil Appeals No. 34, 35 and 36 of 1983 concern 3 suits by a total of 157 persons who claimed to be Penghulus Kampong who had filed the suits against the 3 respondents who were the Menteri Besar, the State Secretary and the Government of the State of Kelantan, respectively.

The plaintiffs in the 3 suits alleged that their dismissal by the first defendant/respondent had been unconstitutional and unlawful, that there had been breach of the relevant constitutional provision of the Kelantan State Constitution as well as Article 8 of the Federal Constitution, and in their prayer they sought:

(1) a declaration that the State Government unconstitutionally acted in dismissing the plaintiffs as Penghulus;

(2) a declaration that such dismissal was contrary to Clause LX (first part) of the Constitution;

(3) an order that the plaintiffs be reinstated as Penghulus alternatively

(4) an enquiry into damages in respect of annual allowances, travelling allowances, gratuity and/or pensions due to the plaintiffs. They also sought further or other reliefs.

The defendants/respondents did not file a defence but an application was made under O. 18 r. 19 of the Rules of the High

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top