SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



Abdul Malek J

By a consent order dated 22 February 1988 (encl 17) following a summons for directions (encl 13) filed on 2 January 1988, both parties had asked for the preliminary issue of 'whether the plaintiffs can sue for rescission on the agreement of 8 August 1984 as the house is not completed by 7 August 1986 which is the completion date' be first determined by arguments in open court on a date to be fixed by the senior assistant registrar.

It is necessary to refer to cl 7 of the relevant agreement (bundle A of encl 4) which provides that 'time shall be the essence of the contract in relation to all the provisions of this agreement and in particular to the payment of any instalment of the purchase price or any part thereof and the payment of all moneys due from the purchaser to the vendor under this agreement' (emphasis mine) and to cl 18(1) of the said agreement which states that 'the said building shall be completed by the vendor and vacant possession delivered to the purchaser within twenty-four (24) calendar months from the date of this agreement'.

However, cl 18(2) of that agreement stipulates that 'if the vendor fails to deliver vacant possession of the said building in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top