JUDGMENTBY: WAN SULEIMAN SCJ

(delivering the judgment of the court): In this appeal we should bear in mind that the first appellant represented by Encik Karpal Singh is really the second accused Illian s/o Endin and the second appellant Yu Kiat Ho represented by Mr. Naughton Christie is the first accused. To save ourselves from confusion, we shall hereinafter refer to the first appellant as Illian and the second appellant as Yu.

The appellants had been charged with jointly trafficking in dangerous drugs, the charge being as follows:

"That you on the 19th day of November, 1978 at about 3.15 p.m. at the

Compound of Hospital Kangar in the District of Kangar, in the State of

Perlis did jointly traffic on your own behalf a dangerous drug, to wit

1077.2 grammes of morphine and 257.9 grammes of heroin and thereby

committed an offence under section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act

1952 (Revised 1980) and punishable under section 39B(2) of the said Act.

"

On information received by PW.2 ASP Zulkifli, he and a police party had waited in ambush in the Kangar Hospital compound. The prosecution evidence is that Zulkfli then saw two males cycling toget