SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img



JUDGMENTBY: HASHIM YEOP A SANI SCJ

(delivering the judgment of the court): The first appellant (M. Ratnavale nee Annalakshmi d/o Vattivelu) and the respondent had known each other since 1956. On 13 March 1967, the first appellant became the registered proprietor of land known as Lot 9987 held under Grant No. 15434 in the Mukim of Batu, Lorong Kenny Bahagia in Kuala Lumpur ("the land"). On 2 November 1967, the first appellant created a charge over the land in favour of one K. Sinnathamby, since deceased. The second appellant (Dr. M. Mahadevan s/o Mahalingam) was the brother-in-law of the first appellant. The first appellants husband passed away on 9 April 1973. The second appellant became one of the executors of the estate of the first appellants husband some time in September 1973.

The respondent, as plaintiff in the court below, alleged conspiracy to defraud against both the first and second appellants. Paragraph 13 of the re-amended statement of claim sets out the particulars of the alleged fraud:

"13. (a) knowing that there was a written agreement for sale of the

said land to the plaintiff and knowing that the issue document of

title had been deli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top