SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Harun Hashim SCJ:

The respondent in both these appeals was employed by the appellant in Rayuan Sivil No. 02-44-91 (Magnum) as an accountant on 1 September 1978. On 1 August 1985 he was romoted to the position of general manager (4-D Operations) with an increase in monthly salary to RM8,000 with effect from 1 January 1986. On 1 April 1987 there was a change of name from gaming department to gaming division and the respondent was appointed head of that division.

By letter of 24 June 1987 Magnum informed the respondent that following a review of the company's management requirements, it was decided to abolish the position of head, gaming division and that he would be retrenched (with retrenchment benefits) with effect from 1 October 1987. According to Magnum, the function of head of gaming division could be performed by the Group general manager, as the latter's duties had since decreased. According to the respondent, however, there was no justification to abolish the position of head of gaming division as the duties of that position had not changed with re-organisation and it was also the principal income earner of the company. The respondent appealed against the retrenchmen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top