SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Abdul Hamid Mohamed JC:

Learned Counsel for the judgment debtor applied for a stay of further proceedings pending the determination of the judgment debtor's appeal to the Supreme Court. Learned Counsel for the petitioning creditor objected to the application.

Section 97 of the Bankruptcy Act 1967, provides:

The Court may at any time, for sufficient reason, make an order staying the proceedings under a bankruptcy petition, either altogether or for a limited time, on such terms and subject to conditions as the Court thinks just.

Rule 138 of the Bankruptcy Rules 1969, provides:

There may be included in a receiving order an order staying any action or proceeding against the debtor or staying proceedings generally.

There is no doubt the words "at any time" include an application made after a receiving and adjudication order has been made - see Realisations Industrielles et Commerciales S.A. v. Loescher and Partners [1957] 1 WLR 1026 and Re Chop Sin Guan Moh & Ors [1965]

The question therefore is whether there is sufficient reason.

As I have stated in the main grounds of judgment, a receiving and adjudication order was first made in the previous proceedings on 20 June 1988. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top