SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Dr. Visu Sinnadurai J:

Facts

At the conclusion of the trial, this Court took time to consider the appropriate sentence to be passed on the three accused.

The three accused, Nazarudin (first accused: Aziz (second accused); and Azizul (third accused), were charged in furtherance of the common intention of all of them to commit murder by causing the death of one Francis Adickalam, an offence punishable under s. 302 of the Penal Code. All three accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. A jury was chosen in accordance with the procedure under the Criminal Procedure Code. The trial then went on for about 4 days.

On 22 December the Deputy Public Prosecutor informed the Court that an amended charge was being tendered. The charge of murder was reduced to one of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, punishable under the first limb of s. 304 of the Penal Code read together with s. 34 of the said Code. The new charge read as follows:

Bahawa kamu, di antara jam 11.00 p.m. 8 Julai 1989 hingga jam 12.45 a.m. 9 Julai 1989, di satu kawasan lapang berhampiran rumah No. 29A, Jalan 8/84, Taman Dato' Senu, di dalam Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, dengan niat yang sama, telah mela

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top