SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Wan Yahya bin Pawan Teh SCJ:

In the High Court in Muar, the 1st respondent, Siland Sendirian Berhad (hereinafter referred as 'the chargor') successfully applied for and obtained a decree annulling the earlier order for sale made by the SAR, forfeiture of the deposit and other consequential reliefs in respect of an auction sale of its land initiated by the 2nd respondent, Eu Finance Berhad (the chargee). The present appeal against the High Court's decision was brought by the 1st appellant, M & J Frozen Food Sdn. Bhd. (the purchaser). The 2nd respondent, Mohd Kepol bin Bidin (the auctioneer) had since passed away and the chargee, perhaps on realising that his redemptive objective would be better served by the High Court's judgment, elected to abandon the appeal.

To ensure a prescriptive appreciation of this case some antecedent events leading to the present appeal are set out in detail: Siland, the chargor at the commencement of the suit at Muar, was the registered owner of all that piece of land held under H.S. (D) 40269, Lot No. PTD 18279, in the Mukim of Plentong, in the District of Johor Bahru, the subject matter of these proceedings (the said property).

The said propert

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top