SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Abdul Malik Ishak J:

I made a ruling sometime ago that the action be restricted between the present plaintiff and the present defendant without having to cite as 2nd to 5th defendants certain government departments including the Government of the State of Johore. The ruling has since been reduced in writing and circulated to all the parties but unfortunately it was not yet reported. No appeal was also lodged in regard to that judgment. This judgment is a product of a full hearing.

The plaintiff, MBF Property Services Sdn Bhd, were said to be the managers for Asal Gemilang Sdn Bhd and Mega Canggih Sdn Bhd under a power of attorney vide no: 39491/93 and had its registered address at 3rd Floor, Wisma MBF, 37C, Jalan Meldrum, 80000 Johor Bahru, Johor. It is not disputed that the defendant was the registered proprietor of a piece of land measuring 178533 square feet held under H.S.(D) 215657, Lot PTD 26138, Mukim Plentong, Daerah Johor Bahru, Johor (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant's land"). The title to the defendant's land has, in the course of the trial, been marked as exh. P7. Pursuant to that power of attorney, the plaintiff became the manager and the lawful atto

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top