SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Abdul Malik Ishak J:

Enclosure 9

By way of encl. 9, the intervenor sought for the following prayers:

(1) that leave be granted to Sogelease Advance (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, the proposed Intervenor to intervene in these proceedings;

(2) that the Applicants do serve the Proposed Intervenor with copies of all proceedings and other cause papers filed herein;

(3) that the meetings of the Scheme Creditors fixed for 28 May 2004 be postponed until the final disposal of this Summons in Chambers;

(4) that the ex parte order dated 28 April 2004 and the Composite Scheme be set aside;

(5) in the alternative, that the Proposed Intervenor be excluded from the Composite Scheme as a Scheme Creditor;

(6) costs;

(7) liberty to apply;

(8) such further or other reliefs as this Honourable Court deems fit.

The parties have consented to prayers (1) and (2) of encl. 9 on 18 May 2004 and I have nothing further to say to that. Prayer (3) of encl. 9 for a deferral of the court convened meeting fixed for 28 May 2004 has become irrelevant and academic because this court has decided to deliver its decision in regard to prayers (4), (5), (6) and (7) on 27 May 2004 and that would be one day before the date of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top