JUDGMENT
Abdul Malik Ishak J:
Enclosure 9
By way of encl. 9, the intervenor sought for the following prayers:
(1) that leave be granted to Sogelease Advance (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, the proposed Intervenor to intervene in these proceedings;
(2) that the Applicants do serve the Proposed Intervenor with copies of all proceedings and other cause papers filed herein;
(3) that the meetings of the Scheme Creditors fixed for 28 May 2004 be postponed until the final disposal of this Summons in Chambers;
(4) that the ex parte order dated 28 April 2004 and the Composite Scheme be set aside;
(5) in the alternative, that the Proposed Intervenor be excluded from the Composite Scheme as a Scheme Creditor;
(6) costs;
(7) liberty to apply;
(8) such further or other reliefs as this Honourable Court deems fit.
The parties have consented to prayers (1) and (2) of encl. 9 on 18 May 2004 and I have nothing further to say to that. Prayer (3) of encl. 9 for a deferral of the court convened meeting fixed for 28 May 2004 has become irrelevant and academic because this court has decided to deliver its decision in regard to prayers (4), (5), (6) and (7) on 27 May 2004 and that would be one day before the date of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.