SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Nik Hashim JCA:

Background

This appeal arose out of a sale and purchase agreement relating to several pieces of land in Sungai Petani which agreement was executed on 20 March 1997 between the appellant (plaintiff in the court below) as purchaser and the respondent (defendant in the court below) as vendor for a consideration of RM71,409,848.04. At the time of the execution of the said agreement, a sum of RM7,140,984.80 being 10% of the total purchase price, was paid by the appellant by way of deposit and to account of the total purchase price. The receipt of the said sum was acknowledged by the respondent under cl. 2.1(a) of the agreement. Under cl. 2.(1)(b) of the agreement, the balance of the purchase price were to be settled in two trances as follows:

(i) 15% of the purchase price, ie, RM10,711,477.20 was payable within nine months on or before 19 December 1997; and

(ii) final balance of 75% of purchase price ie, RM53,557,386.04 was payable on or before 19 December 1997 but the appellant has a right to extension of time of nine months for this payment upon payment of interest at 8%.

The appellant failed to pay RM10,711,477.20 on 19 December 1997 nor the said RM53,557,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top